Scientists Discover "World's Funniest Joke"

Source: Scotsman(UK)In the largest scientific study ever conducted on humor, Scientists have announced that the below joke is "The world's funniest joke".

"Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn’t seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed.

"The other guy whips out his phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps: ‘My friend is dead! What can I do?’ The operator says: ‘Calm down, I can help. First, let’s make sure he’s dead.’

"There is a silence, then a shot is heard. Back on the phone, the guy says: ‘OK, now what?’"

I hate jokes...

Around the Sun 23 Times.

Wow, I turned 23 today. Last year at my birthday gathering, I made a short and succinct toast: "To crushing American Fascism!" At the time, I had been blogging for a whole two weeks, didn't know my basic HTML tags, and had just wrapped up English Composition 1... my how this year seems to have just slipped by. Lord knows where I'll be a year from now.

Survey Shows Some Consumers Wary of Bloggers' Rights?

This is an odd claim coming from tech world news -- I'd even go as far as to call it obvious spin. The lead sentence reads:

A significant minority of respondents to a survey conducted by Hostway.com, a national provider of managed Internet services, say that bloggers should not benefit from the same First Amendment protections that are afforded conventional journalists.

Why was the story framed as "a significant minority is against 1st amendment rights for bloggers"? The results of the survey showed that 51.7% of respondants believed that bloggers should have the same right to free speech as journalists, and 27.3% neither agreed nor disagreed. Only 21 percent believed that bloggers should not receive the same protection. So why is the position that is outweighed by more than 2 to 1 cited as "a significant minority". To put it another way, the day after Bush was elected, what if the NYTimes headline read: "A Significant Number of Americans Voted Against Bush". Would you call that partisan spin? If so, why isn't this clearly anti-blog spin? Then again, anti-blog opinions are likely to becoming increasingly vogue.

You just watch: over the next few months it will be the new trend in the media to pull out some old well dressed credible-looking dinosaurs to say: "Bloggers aren't journalists... blogging is typing... I've been in the Mass Media for 50 years, so I know what's going on with this new unpredictable technology... wah wah, wah wah..."

Ho vs. Hoe

"The trial transcript quotes Ms. Hayden as saying Murphy called her a snitch bitch “hoe.” A “hoe,” of course, is a tool used for weeding and gardening. We think the court reporter, unfamiliar with rap music (perhaps thankfully so), misunderstood Hayden’s response. We have taken the liberty of changing “hoe” to “ho,” a staple of rap music vernacular as, for example, when Ludacris raps “You doin’ ho activities with ho tendencies.”

-footnote one from the offical trial records of United States v. Miller

Reaction to the CNN Guerrilla Spam Allegations

Some were extremely skeptical of my claim that CNN was engaging in blog driven Guerrilla marketing, “What, besides pure speculation, links this to CNN or Time Warner?" asks Brooks Jackson, the director of FactCheck.org. "It could be anybody." Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales argued, “Trace the ip number to somewhere or someone interesting, and you've got a story.  As it is, you've got spammers acting in ways that are incomprehensible.” Wales concludes, “Tinfoil hats and black helicopters have more credibility, to my mind.” However, one expert disagrees with Wales’s judgment of the spam. Describing the strategy of the alleged CNN spammers, the blog Spamroll asserts, “Frankly, the premise of the suspicion, and the way it was done, make a heck of a lot of sense.”

The vast majority of the bloggers and publications were not so as quick Jackson and Wales to discredit the story. Though only a minority of them delivered a guilty verdict to CNN; far fewer were willing to argue that CNN was innocent.

Edit Liberal Paper

By Robert Green Ingersoll [found via Majikthise]

A LIBERAL paper should be edited by a Liberal man. And by the word Liberal I mean, not only free, not only one who thinks for himself, not only one who has escaped from the prisons of customs and creed, but one who is candid, intelligent and kind -- that is to say, Liberal toward others.

This Liberal editor should not forever play upon one string, no matter how wonderful the music. He should not have his attention forever fixed upon one question -- that is to say, he should not look through a reversed telescope and narrow his horizon to that degree that he sees only one thing.

To know that the Bible is the literature of a barbarous people, to know that it is uninspired, to be certain that the supernatural does not and cannot exist -- all this is but the beginning of wisdom. This only lays the foundation for unprejudiced observation. To kill weeds, to fell forests, to drove away or exterminate wild beasts -- this is preparatory to doing something of greater value. Of course the weeds must be killed, the forests must be felled. and the beasts must be destroyed before the building of homes and the cultivation of fields.

A Liberal paper should not discuss theological questions alone. Intelligent people everywhere have given up most of the old superstitions. They have pretty well made up their minds what is false, and they want to know something that is true. For this reason, a Liberal paper should keep abreast of the discoveries of the human mind. No science should be neglected; no fact should be overlooked. Inventions should be described and understood. And not only this, but the beautiful in thought, in form and color, should be preserved. The paper should be filled with things calculated to interest thoughtful, intelligent and serious people. There should be a column for children as well as for men and women.

Coming From Wired?

Coming from Wired? You'll probably want to read my original article on CNN comment spam. In addition, all of my posts relating to this story have been classified under Guerrilla Spam.

We now return to blogging with the regular and conspicious lack of planning, foresight, or purpose.

CSS Reboot

In need of some inspiration for a new blog design (I sure am)? Check out CSS reboot.

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed