Protecting yourself from SEO Censorship

I got contacted by a journalist (who I happen to be a regular reader of) yesterday. He was following up on the investigation I did into CNN comment spam, and some similar stories. I thought I'd post an answer to one of his questions:

What are these people -- if not the companies themselves -- doing to manipulate search rankings, and what can bloggers and Google do to fix things?

The SEO tactic which poses a danger to bloggers is perhaps most simply put as "reverse search engine optimization". Google has a set of filters which detect and punish pages that use certain outdated SEO tactics. In the case of the CNN spams, we observe a tactic called keyword stuffing. Put simply, keyword stuffing is flooding a page with repeated search terms, (i.e. CNN CNN CNN CNN CNN CNN CNN). At one time, this tactic actually worked; but now google has a set of filters whicheasily detect this practice, and in response, either punish, or remove the page from the index. In the case of spams that target posts that are discussing a company, the possible damage of stuffed keywords is greatly intensified. But to understand that, you must first understand how google assigns weight to the content in the page. For convenience, we'll use the page of mine that was attacked "CNN: Television's Great Orifice"

Learning About Dying

Today, Dave Pollard posted a powerful essay: Learning About Dying

The Idea: Governments and organized religion exploit our ignorance and fear of death, to everyone's disadvantage. It's time we faced down the exploiters and faced up to death's simple truths. [read more]

Where Newsweek Really Went Wrong

"The real crime is not bias or secret sources. It's fluff. It's pseudo-sophistication. It's a lost sense of what good journalism is all about. The real problem with investigative reporting is that it so rarely happens. The solvent for ethics in journalism is entertainment." - Jay Rosen, The Great Sage  

Hire-A-Killer.Com

One wonders whether they just laugh at their perspective customers, or do they turn them in? I think its probably a case-by-case basis sort of thing.

The Eloquence of Absolute Faith

Rev. Creighton Lovelace. What a name. In the wake of the newsweek story, his church put up a roadside bulletin declaring, "The Koran Needs to Be Flushed!" (emphasis added)

Take a look at this video of Lovelace being interviewed. This Rev. comes off like a character from Waiting for Guffman.

Be All the Blogger You Can Be

Keith Robinson writes 13 ways to Be A More Productive Blogger.

"Productive" blogger.... yeah, its irony on a base level; but I think its a hoot.

A-Lister's Secret to Success

TNL.NET summerizes an informal study he did on A-listers:

On that particular day, the top five bloggers created an average of 30 entries, with each entry being under 150 words. This reminds me of something Phillip Greenspun, another A-list blogger, had said about why he liked blogs: "It allows me to experiments with the three paragraph form."Considering the size of the average entry from this, it seems very clear that an entry should be brief.

Its hard to disagree with this, especially when you put your reader's time in context. However, if you want to be an a-list blogger, don't forget to talk to our inner reptile.

Galloway Confronts Christopher Hitchens

My opinion of George Galloway has risen in light of this episode reported by the guardian. Apparently, right before Galloway testified, he said this:

"You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay," Mr Galloway in formed him. "Your hands are shaking. You badly need another drink," he added later, ignoring Mr Hitchens's questions and staring intently ahead. "And you're a drink-soaked ..." Eventually Mr Hitchens gave up. "You're a real thug, aren't you?" he hissed, stalking away.

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed